Why Was Sean “Diddy” Combs Denied Bail 

Why Was Sean “Diddy” Combs Denied Bail 

9/18/20204

Sean “Diddy” Combs was denied bail in his criminal case due to several concerns raised by the court and prosecutors. Here’s a simplified breakdown:

Key Issues Leading to Bail Denial:

  • Risk to Witnesses: The court believed there was a high risk that Combs could try to interfere with witnesses. Past accusations suggested he had previously reached out to potential witnesses, which raised concerns about tampering or obstructing justice.
  • Public Safety: Prosecutors argued that Combs posed a significant danger to the community, partly due to allegations involving violent and coercive behavior, particularly in the context of the sex trafficking charges. The judge found no set of conditions that would fully ensure public safety.
  • Flight Risk: Although Combs’ defense team proposed several measures, such as surrendering his passport and putting up a $50 million bond, the court was not convinced that these measures would prevent him from fleeing the country or evading the trial, especially given his wealth and resources.

Charges Against Combs:

  • Racketeering and Sex Trafficking: The charges against Combs include operating a criminal enterprise that allegedly engaged in sex trafficking, forced labor, and other serious crimes over a period of time. If convicted, he faces life in prison.

Defense’s Proposed Bail Package:

  • Home Detention and Monitoring: Combs’ team offered strict home detention with a ban on female visitors (except family members) and frequent check-ins. However, the judge still ruled that these conditions wouldn’t be enough to mitigate the risks involved.

Conclusion:

The court prioritized concerns about witness safety, public risk, and the potential for flight over the proposed bail package, leading to Combs’ continued detention until trial (Dallas Examiner) (The Independent).

– Pete

This Week’s Featured Verdict

Motor Vehicle
Traffic accident led to four surgeries, plaintiff claimed

Verdict: $650,000

Bookhard v. Owen

Kings County Supreme Court

Prevailing Attorney: Peter W. Kolp; Peter W. Kolp, P.C.; Brooklyn, N.Y. (trial counsel); Friedman & Simon, L.L.P.; Jericho, N.Y.

FEATURED VERDICT DEEP DIVE

This week’s Featured Verdict is a Kings County case that concluded a few weeks ago. The suit’s plaintiff claimed that a rear-end traffic accident resulted in tears of a shoulder and a wrist, an injury of an elbow, and two herniated spinal discs. She underwent four surgeries, and she claimed that she suffers residual limitations. The defense contended that the plaintiff’s injuries predated the accident, but the jury found otherwise. It awarded damages of $650,000. That’s the fourth-largest New York jury verdict for 2021, based on cases reported to us, and No. 55 of all time for a rear-end vehicular accident in Kings County. Here are the top five jury verdicts statewide for rear-end auto accidents.